Judge Issues TRO Against $14 Mln UBS Team that Jumped to Morgan Stanley

(Headline and story updated to reflect judge’s granting of TRO prohibiting customer solicitation through January 7, 2021.)
A judge has ordered a $14-million Boca Raton, FL, team that left UBS for Morgan Stanley earlier this month to stop soliciting former clients through the first week of January 2021 and to return to UBS confidential information they had.
“I am not persuaded by Defendant Sean Fetterman’s argument that the preliminary injunction will cause substantial harm to his reputation,” U.S. District Court Judge Donald Middlebrooks in Palm Beach wrote in a December 23 order granting UBS’s request for a preliminary injunction. “He has spent decades building his reputation and client relationships, and those are unlikely to be substantially harmed by a brief injunction.”
The team members violated client confidentiality covenants in their UBS employee agreements while the Fetterman brothers and advisor David Raphan also violated solicitation agreements, the judge ruled.
He was skeptical of their testimony that they obtained client contact information from online public records and directly from clients rather than from UBS-owned data, citing “the sheer number of clients that the Defendants succeeded in making contact with over the weekend following their resignations and the detailed account information that they purportedly obtained from clients.”
The Fetterman team, which generated $14.3 million in annual revenue for UBS on $1.79 billion in managed assets, negotiated an “eye-popping transition deal” with Morgan Stanley that could reach $35-40 million, UBS asserted when it sought the temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction on December 11. The complaint said Sean Fetterman personally managed about $1.25 billion of the team’s assets and produced more than $9.5 million of its revenue.
“We are pleased the Court found that Mr. Fetterman and his team violated their agreements and is holding them to the terms of those agreements,” a UBS spokeswoman said in an emailed statement. “We look forward to continuing to prosecute this matter in FINRA arbitration.”
In its TRO request, UBS said the Fetterman team appears to have convinced “an unusual number” of clients to close out securities-backed loans in the months leading to their resignation so that their accounts would be eligible for transfer via the ACAT system.
The complaint also noted a detail that one employment lawyer who is not involved in the case said appears to signal particular bitterness about the departure of Fetterman, who ranked #5 this year among Barron’s “top” Florida advisors.
“Remarkably, Sean’s resignation occurred just days after UBS had just completed a bespoke renovation and build-out of his team’s office suite that cost the firm in excess of $100,000,” said the complaint, which was filed by law firm Littler Mendelson on behalf of the wirehouse.
Reached on his cellphone before the judge issued the TRO, Fetterman said he could not immediately comment on the suit because he was monitoring the market, but noted that the renovation that began 18 months ago has still not been completed.
“The firm brings this action in view of this team’s malicious and blatant disregard for their contractual obligations and fiduciary duties to UBS, which UBS intends to enforce to the fullest extent of the law,” said UBS Wealth Management spokesman Huw Williams.
Morgan Stanley was not named as a defendant in the TRO request.
Fetterman, who joined UBS in May 2008 from Wachovia Securities with his brother Adam, signed a commitment two years ago to eventually enter UBS’s “ALFA” program that allows retiring advisors to be paid for five years on accounts transitioned to other advisors, according to the lawsuit. He received a forgivable loan of $7.05 million for committing to the program, it said.
The complaint did not accuse Fetterman of owing UBS money on the loan or on other bonuses, but said his ALFA commitment was one of several employment agreements he had signed containing noncompete, non-solicit and confidentiality provisions.
In addition to Sean and Adam Fetterman, the lawsuit names as defendants junior brokers David Raphan and Brandon Fetterman, who is Sean’s son, client associate Deborah Humphrey and team administrator Leticia Buckley.
Both UBS and Morgan Stanley withdrew three years ago from the Protocol for Broker Recruiting, which permits advisors to retain some client-contact information when moving to signatory firms. While the exit gives the firms the whip of litigation, suits from UBS against fleeing brokers have been relatively sparse, according to several employment lawyers.
Get em UBS !
The hypocrisy of these two non-protocol firms is stunning when they go after each other like this. Sometimes you really do reap what you sow, and that is certainly being borne out in this latest example.
Nice to see two non-protocol firms pissing away money again. Everything in the warehouse world always goes full circle. Spending exorbitant amount of buying advisors and arguing in court for new advisors, while not spending money on building the businesses of their loyal advisors. Time to think hard.
Hey UBS it won’t help.
So UBS is upset because the clients showed no feelings for UBS and closed out SBLs to prepare for the big leave? It literally proves a basic point. The clients had more allegiance to his/her advisor than to UBS. Also, MS knows that the clients themselves care more about the advisor than they care about MS, so they paid the advisor to bring clients to them they cannot get. The whole things proves how useless the firm you work at is and how the only name on a business card that clients have any loyalty to is the name of their advisor.
Also proves that all advisors should roll firms for a check at least once or twice. It’s not like UBS was going to match what MS gave these guys, so good for them. Can’t wait to read about this team leaving MS for Wells or some other firm in a few years for another big check. These big houses are all the same and they never really care about the clients anyway. Might as well take their money and run. Like stealing from a bunch of thieves anyway.
Busy monitoring the market…yeah right
Sounds like the advisors had no good legal advice prior to the move. They are now “RICHER” but in a potentially bad situation. I have to admire their attitude. Sell the business to UBS and sell it again to Morgan Stanley. I think UBS, Who I hate, might have a case this time. It is funny to see 2 non-protocol firms in court. Both do the same things in still recruiting.
A lot of production that will be sorely missed no doubt. Given their rep in the market, UBS will otherwise not be sad to see them go.
Where can I find out more about their reputation in the market?
It’s Boca Raton. The absolute cesspool of the industry
Instead of this senselessness these firms could pay up for loyalty and retention. In the process advisors would be happy and loyal to their existing firms, advisors and firms would both be better off financially and no one would need to be suing one another!
100% nailed it. Firms waste so much money on recruiting and carrot and stick compensation/retention plans… I can’t imagine imagine what they waste on compensation plan consultants to annually tweak the grids, deferred compensation and recruiting packages!! What a farce that is to add more management jobs and overhead.
Imagine if a firm just cut the crap out entirely and focused on straight payout to the advisor and top notch technology? No spending on: recruiting, compensation consultants, chasing departing advisors with costly litigation (which we all know, even if the firm wins, it loses, after all, it’s the client’s money).
Suddenly with better pay and tech: that firm would become THE destination place on the street. Happier advisor force, less need to spend on recruiting because advisors would simply want to be there (organic growth).
The musical chairs game was fine for Wirehouses and Regionals until there was a leak in the system (independance). Now the round robin game will always have some advisors that opt out of the merry go round and the pace will keep increasing as firms cannibalize their workforce.
We are in the business of trust and relationships. The only hope for wires/regionals is to own up to reality and see who owns what relationship. Firms need to focus on their relationship with the advisor. The advisor will always hold the relationship with the client. As soon as one of them figures out that person to person trust can’t be cut out of the equation and starts focusing on keeping the advisors happy will be the first to stop cannibalizing their workforce.
You literally just described Raymond James.
So glad to already be at Commonwealth.
Same, same.
First of all , Boca Raton is THE absolute garbage dump for scammers , con artists and people who profess to be financial advisors. The client base almost asks to be scammed because they’re inherently the greediest clients (they’re really just customers) that force their advisors to present risk trades because they’re constantly looking for the “bahhhhhgain ideas.” Anyone down there in that cesspool known as S Fla deserves their fate in the industry ,good and bad. It’s horrible.
Secondly , while ideally advisors write about the “ideal“ firm and technology, and payout and blah blah blah, the truth is that in a market like south Fl greed and slimy “deal “ parameters are the real attraction. The same advisors that always say, “it’s not about the money!” when being recruited, or “I wanna do what’s best for my clients“ are usually the biggest deal ***s there are. Because if they really believe that BS they’d all be independent advisors. But they’re not. They go for the quick buck in S Fla. And so these firms, these greedy clients and sleazy advisors, as contentious as they become …so deserve each other.
I was encouraged that LPL recently announced their employee channel will have payouts of 50-70%. I think it’s about time firms competed for talent by straight payout.
Blake says, “If you don’t like it, leave.”
Other than that, it appears that some commenters could benefit from therapy.